The Fed: Born from Panic, Shaped by Policy

The Federal Reserve is one of the most powerful yet misunderstood institutions in America. It was created over a century ago to bring stability to a financial system prone to devastating panics, and the Fed now manages the world's largest economy through its control of monetary policy. But its independence from politics remains both its defining characteristic and a persistent source of controversy—particularly when presidents clash with Fed chairs over the direction of American interest rates.

A Brief History: Born from Crisis

Key Historical Milestones:

The Federal Reserve was established in 1913 after the Panic of 1907 nearly collapsed the entire US financial system. Following the norm of American federal governance, the Federal Reserve Act created a compromise between centralized control and regional autonomy—twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks coordinated by a Board of Governors in Washington.

The Fed's failures during the Great Depression—allowing the money supply to contract catastrophically—led to the Banking Act of 1935, which strengthened central governance and created today's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Post-war legislation established the Fed's dual mandate: promoting maximum employment and stable prices.

The Fed's Core Functions

The Fed conducts monetary policy through control of the federal funds rate. When inflation exceeds the 2% target, the Fed raises rates to cool demand; and during recessions with rising unemployment, it lowers rates to encourage borrowing and investment. The Fed must constantly balance these sometimes-conflicting objectives.

Primary Responsibilities:

• Monetary Policy: Adjusts interest rates and money supply—raising rates to cool inflation, lowering them to stimulate growth

• Banking Supervision: Examines banks for safety, enforces consumer protection, monitors systemic risks

• Payment Systems: Processes trillions in transactions annually through Fedwire and FedACH

• Fiscal Services: Maintains Treasury accounts, processes government payments, facilitates securities auctions

  
  

Congressional Mandates:

• Maximum Employment: Promote job creation and low unemployment

• Stable Prices: Maintain price stability with 2% inflation target (adopted 2012)

• Moderate Long-Term Interest Rates: Support sustainable economic growth

• Currency Stability: Issue and manage U.S. dollar bills as legal tender

Since the Global Financial Crisis, when rates were driven to zero, the Fed has relied increasingly on its balance sheet as an additional policy tool. Large-scale asset purchases—commonly known as quantitative easing (QE)—and subsequent balance sheet runoff have become central to monetary transmission. While interest rates affect borrowing costs broadly, asset purchases operate primarily through financial markets, influencing asset prices, risk premiums, and liquidity conditions.

Governance Structure and Decision-Making

Below is how the Fed is structured, which is important to understand given recent events.  The key point here is that the FOMC is what sets rates and it is composed of the 7 members that Presidents’ appoint, 4 members from regional banks and 1 vote from the NY Fed.

Organizational Framework:

• Board of Governors: 7 members appointed by President, confirmed by Senate

• Governor Term Structure: Each of the 7 seats has a fixed 14-year term expiring every two years (January 31st of even-numbered years)

• How Appointments Work: New governors serve out the remainder of their seat's current term, not a fresh 14-year term

• Chair and Vice Chair: Designated by President for 4-year renewable terms from among sitting governors

• FOMC Composition: 7 governors + 5 regional Fed bank presidents (rotating annually) which sets rates

• New York Fed: Holds permanent FOMC vote; other 11 regional banks rotate

The staggered term structure is crucial to understanding Fed independence. The Board has seven seats, each with its own fixed 14-year term expiring on a predetermined schedule—one every two years:

• Seat A: term runs 2024–2038

• Seat B: term runs 2026–2040

• Seat C: term runs 2028–2042

• And so on...

When someone is appointed to fill a vacancy, they serve out whatever time remains on that seat's current term, not a new 14-year term. If a governor in Seat A (term 2024–2038) resigns in 2030, their replacement serves only 2030–2038—eight years. Only when a seat's full term expires does the next appointee get the complete 14 years.

This creates powerful constraints. A president taking office in 2025 faces:

• 2026: One seat expires—first appointment opportunity

• 2028: Second seat expires

• 2030: Third seat (if reelected)

• 2032: Fourth seat (if reelected)

Under normal circumstances, a single-term president typically appoints only two governors; even a two-term president usually appoints just four—a majority of the seven board members, but still not enough to fully control the 12 member FOMC which has an additional 5 votes that remain outside Presidential control.

The Question of Independence

To highlight some of the features that make some of the Fed fairly independent of political will:

Structural Independence Features:

• Self-Funding: Fed finances itself from Treasury securities interest, not congressional appropriations

• Limited Removal Power: President cannot fire governors except for malfeasance

• Structure: FOMC has 12 members with President at most able to control 4

• Staggered Terms: 14-year terms with biennial expirations prevent rapid Board transformation

• Long Tenure: Governors typically outlast appointing presidents

• Institutional Accountability: Chair testifies to Congress; Board submits detailed reports

Why Independence Matters:

• Protects Against Short-Term Political Pressure: Politicians favor pre-election stimulus even when inflationary

• Enables Unpopular Decisions: Independent Fed can raise rates during weakness if needed for stability

• Maintains Anti-Inflation Credibility: Prevents expectations of deficit accommodation

Historical Validation:

• Pre-1951: Fed subordination to Treasury compromised price stability through artificially low rates

• Volcker Era (1979–1987): Demonstrated willingness to tolerate deep recession rather than accommodate inflation

• Cross-Country Evidence: Politically dependent central banks experienced higher, more volatile inflation

The Fed's independence protects monetary policy from short-term political pressures. Politicians favor stimulus before elections even when inflationary; an independent central bank resists these pressures.

The Federal Reserve is not independent in defining its goals—Congress sets the mandate—but it is independent in choosing the instruments used to achieve those goals. This distinction is critical. Democratic institutions determine what outcomes society seeks, while technocratic expertise governs how those outcomes are pursued. The Fed’s legitimacy rests on this separation, not on insulation from oversight altogether.

And history largely validates this design. Before the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord, the Fed pegged rates low to reduce government borrowing costs, compromising price stability. The 1970s inflation crisis worsened under political pressure for accommodation until Paul Volcker’s appointment as Chair in 1979. He raised rates dramatically despite intense criticism and deep recession, breaking inflation's back and establishing the Fed's credibility.

Yet independence isn't absolute. Congress can modify the Fed's framework, and the Chair testifies regularly before congressional committees. This balances independence with democratic legitimacy.

Note that the path that the President appears to be pursuing to get control of the Board is verbal accusations of malfeasance and actions taken by the Justice Department against Lisa Cook and Jerome Powell, which may or may not pan out in Trump’s favor.

Presidential Influence and the Path to Control

To recap things a bit:

Presidential Appointment Timeline:

• Single-term president (4 years): Typically appoints 2 of 7 governors (29%)

• Two-term president (8 years): Typically appoints 4 of 7 governors (57%)

• Full Board & More Importantly FOMC control : Would require 7 appointments—nearly impossible within 8 years absent multiple resignations

Obstacles to Presidential Control:

• Term structure constraints: Even two full terms rarely produce 7 vacancies

• Governors' independence: Technical expertise and long tenure often override political loyalties

• Regional bank presidents: Hold 5 of 12 FOMC votes; appointed through regional boards with private sector input

Consequences of Political Control:

• Market disruption: Capital flight as investors lose confidence in inflation protection

• Currency depreciation: Dollar weakness as independence guarantee disappears

• Rising long-term rates: Investors demand inflation-risk premiums

For direct control over monetary policy, a president would need loyalists controlling the seven governor seats to ensure an FOMC majority. But the term structure makes this nearly impossible within eight years. Moreover, governors don't always vote as expected—the technical nature of monetary policy and long tenure often override political loyalties.

The costs of losing this independence—market disruption, currency weakness, and elevated inflation—would likely be severe and destructive. As Turkey and Argentina have shown, when central banks become tools of the executive branch, investors flee, the currency devalues and the economy implodes.

Why Independence Matters

The case for independence rests on "time inconsistency"—policymakers have incentives to promise low inflation but deliver stimulus when decision time arrives. If the public anticipates this, they preemptively raise wages and prices, creating self-fulfilling inflation. An independent central bank makes price stability promises credible.

Independence is tested most severely when price stability conflicts with financial stability. Tight monetary policy may be necessary to restrain inflation even as it increases stress in banks, credit markets, or sovereign debt. Political pressure intensifies precisely when the Fed must choose which risk poses the greater long-term threat. Independence allows those decisions to be made with a focus on systemic outcomes rather than electoral timelines.

The Fed built anti-inflation credibility over decades through the Volcker era, demonstrating willingness to tolerate recession rather than accommodate rising prices. This keeps inflation expectations anchored. President Trump’s criticisms of Chair Jerome Powell for raising rates generated market volatility, showing how even perceived political pressure undermines effectiveness.

Conclusion

The Federal Reserve's independence—a powerful agency operating outside direct political control—represents a remarkable and important achievement ensuring American wealth persists by not allowing those in power to make monetary policy a tool or re-election. The staggered 14-year term structure, with seats expiring every two years, ensures even a two-term president typically appoints only four of seven governors, and makes it extremely difficult to fully control the twelve member FOMC.  Jerome Powell vacates his seat in a few months anyway, so why the President feels the need to step up the pressure right now is anyone’s guess. A determined president like Trump facing or creating multiple simultaneous vacancies via lawfare could accelerate the Board’s transformation.  But even in the extreme, it is unlikely he will be able to replace all 7 members with loyalists.  The most likely outcome is a very divided FOMC with Trump appointees pushing one way while others pushing back.

---

Make the most of these insights using Modelist. We create customized investment models for the fiduciary financial advisor. Get in touch with us at hello@modelist.me for a personal consultation.

Modelist Inc. is a registered investment advisor. Registration with a regulatory authority does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information contained in this material is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation of any security, investment, or investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including interest rate risks, inflation risks, and the risk of loss of principal, and are not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Modelist Inc. believes, to the best of its knowledge, that this material does not contain any false or materially misleading statements or omit material facts.

This material includes information obtained from third-party sources. Modelist Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of such information and disclaims any liability for errors or omissions arising from its use. Returns cited are based on publicly available Treasury market data and may not reflect actual investment outcomes, fees, or expenses.

Each investor’s situation is unique; please consult with a professional financial advisor, tax accountant, or legal representative, as applicable, to develop an individualized plan or address any questions you may have.